Is the call of Indian community to boycott by Prof Ramasamy is justify. Here is our editorial opinion why me may should boycott the election.
| Prof Ramasamy actively attacking PH and call for boycotting the KKB election. |
As the Kuala Kubu Bharu election approaches, it's imperative to confront the uncomfortable truth that reverberates within the Indian community of Malaysia. For the first time in Malaysian history, the absence of Tamil cabinet ministers speaks volumes about the systemic marginalization endured by this community. This pivotal moment demands a profound examination of the structural inequalities and injustices perpetuated by the political establishment.
Historical Disenfranchisement:
The absence of Tamil cabinet ministers in Malaysia's political landscape is not merely an oversight; it's a stark manifestation of the historical disenfranchisement endured by the Indian community. Despite being an integral part of Malaysian society, Indians have often found themselves relegated to the margins, denied meaningful representation and opportunities for advancement within the corridors of power.
Diminished Support and Aid:
Comparative analysis reveals a troubling trend: the support and aid extended to the Indian community have dwindled in recent years. While past administrations, notably under Najib Razak, demonstrated a commitment to addressing the socio-economic needs of marginalized communities, the current government's efforts pale in comparison. The disparity in assistance underscores a concerning lack of prioritization and empathy towards the plight of Indian Malaysians.
Cultural Insensitivity and Neglect:
The recent incident involving Anwar Ibrahim, where he purportedly led an Indian individual in reciting Quranic verses, highlights a deeper issue of cultural insensitivity and neglect within the political sphere. Such actions not only trivialize the diverse identities within the Indian community but also perpetuate a narrative of tokenism and exploitation for political gain. It's indicative of a broader pattern of neglect and indifference towards the concerns and aspirations of Indian Malaysians.
Lingering Challenges with Mitra Fund:
Despite pledges to address the grievances of the Indian community, challenges persist with initiatives like the Mitra Fund. The failure to effectively allocate resources and address systemic barriers has left many Indian Malaysians grappling with economic insecurity and social marginalization. The unresolved issues surrounding the Mitra Fund underscore the government's failure to prioritize the needs of the Indian community and deliver meaningful change.
Call for Meaningful Representation:
In light of these systemic injustices, the call for absence from the Kuala Kubu Bharu election emerges as a potent form of protest and resistance. It's a collective assertion of agency and dignity, demanding recognition, representation, and justice for the Indian community. By abstaining from an electoral process that perpetuates their marginalization, Indian Malaysians send a powerful message: their voices will no longer be silenced, their concerns will no longer be ignored.
Conclusion:
The decision to boycott the Kuala Kubu Bharu election is not born out of apathy or indifference but out of a profound sense of injustice and disenchantment with a system that has failed to uphold the principles of equality and inclusivity. It's a rallying cry for systemic change, for a Malaysia where every community is valued, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive. Until genuine efforts are made to address the grievances of the Indian community and ensure their meaningful participation in the political process, the call for absence from the election remains a poignant reminder of the urgent need for reform and justice.
From the Lungitaiment (News & Politic Division) Editorial table
0 Comments